Then we got ambitious with our trials: In February 1980
at the Winter Olympics at Lake Placid, the television feed was
carried over an experimental optical fiber system and broadcast
around the world. Many of us had our fingers crossed! In the
end, it was fabulous to see the “Miracle on Ice” performance
of the U.S. men’s ice hockey team via the superior television
picture made possible by our fiber system. These first-generation lasers were subsequently used in the fiber systems for the
Northeast Corridor and many other terrestrial trunk applications. Technology “proof of principle” had become “
technology of choice!”
The U.S. men’s hockey team defeat- ed the Soviets at the 1980 Olympics in Lake Placid. The television feed was carried on an optical fiber sys- tem developed at Bell Labs.
Semiconductor lasers—the second generation
Our second-generation lasers were designed for use in the
1. 3 µm window of the improved, single-mode, 5-µm-diameter
fibers. Their buried-heterostructure design made use of two
epitaxial growth sequences with an etching step in between.
The first (planar) growth sequence
of this improved device was made using
metal-organic chemical-vapor deposition
(MOCVD) and incorporated a highly
resistive Fe-doped layer adjacent to the
substrate; this greatly reduced current
leakage and improved the high temperature performance of the device. This layer
had the desirable high resistance of a
proton-bombarded layer, but without the
proton bombardment!
Most important, the layer reduced the
capacitance, making the device suitable
for high-speed modulation. Following an
etching step to produce the “V” groove,
the final growth sequence was done using
LPE. This growth made use of the fact
that LPE, when used to grow in a groove,
could produce the crescent-shaped active
layer shown in the figure on the facing page.
This seemingly contorted fabrication process ultimately produced very high-yield, high-performance, high-reliability lasers
that stayed in volume production for more than 10 years (from
about 1984 to 1997). These multimode lasers could be used
at data rates up to about 2 Gb/s. They were, for example, the
mainstay of the Bell System’s 417 Mb/s applications, and, later,
its FT-series-G 1. 7 Gb/s applications. For example, the lasers
were used to provide the first high-speed 1.7-Gb interconnects
among some 200 major U.S. cities.
One of the reasons that these and subsequent lasers came to
possess such high reliability and could be applied in terrestrial
trunk and undersea applications, was that we became increasingly able to screen out lasers that had non-fundamental modes
of degradation. This process came to be called “purging.” It
used short-duration high-stress regimes, specific to the individual laser design, in the laser certification process. An example
would be the application of 250-m A dc current for 10 hours in
Wikimedia Commons
a 150 °C ambient followed by a before-and-after comparison of
the laser’s room temperature characteristics.
We subsequently designed, developed and manufactured more
sophisticated InP-based lasers, including designs with distrib-
uted feedback gratings to produce a single,
stabilized wavelength. Zilko et al. described
an example in 1989 (J. Quantum Electron
25, 2091). An electro-absorption modula-
tor was later incorporated, on the same
chip, into this design. Descendants of these
devices—operating at data rates as high as
40 Gb/s, but more typically at 10 Gb/s—
are useful for wavelength-division-multi-
plexing applications and remain in volume
production in the United States, Japan
and other parts of the world. They make
use of the “ultimate” low loss 1. 5-1. 6 µm
region in modern single-mode fibers. My
understanding is that MOCVD technol-
ogy has now substantially replaced LPE in
laser manufacture.
In February 1980 at
the Winter Olympics
at Lake Placid, the
television feed was
carried over an
experimental optical
fiber system and
broadcast around the
world. Many of us had
our fingers crossed!
Device Research Conferences
I went to a good many meetings during these years, but I
always found the Device Research Conferences to be special.
They were small and somewhat informal gatherings held in
late June at a university after summer recess had begun (and
where the room and board was cheap). Early on, it was decided
that the conference location would alternate between East and
West. After awhile, “West” came to mean the University of
California at Santa Barbara and “East” to mean the University
of Colorado in Boulder.
We had some fun too, and we got to know one another
well. For example, I remember near the end of the conference I
chaired, Herb Kroemer asked me at dinner in his strong voice
to come over to the table where he was sitting with several
other previous conference chairs and join “The Old Farts’
Club.” This was before Herb became famous.
During these long difficult years, I sometimes pon-
dered the meaning of Wolfgang Pauli’s characterization of